Practical Reasoning and Proposing: Tools for e-Democracy
نویسنده
چکیده
It is shown how two tools developed in argumentation theory are useful for AI systems for electronic democracy [2,3] and more generally for formal dialogue systems representing deliberation. The novel part of this analysis is that it represents the speech of proposing as a small dialogue exchange in which one party practically reasons with another, based on premises that both are committed to, as collaborative participants in a deliberation dialogue. The structure of practical reasoning as a type of argument as analyzed in [6] is brought to bear, to bring out special features of the speech act of proposing that make it a nice fit with the formal framework for deliberation dialogue constructed by [4].
منابع مشابه
The Structured Analysis of Requirements and Challenges of E-Learning and Proposing a a Practical Model for Successful Implementation of E- Courses in Medical Sciences
Introduction: The rapid expansion of e-learning elucidates the necessity of paying attention to this phenomenon by all educational centres especially medicals. Considering the importance of this subject and regarding the commencement of new courses in our country as well as the establishment of higher education disciplines, this paper aimed to review the structured analysis of requirements, cha...
متن کاملMulti-Agent Argumentation for eDemocracy
In this paper we discuss how a computational version of argumentation involving practical reasoning can be applied to the domain of e-democracy. We begin with a discussion of practical reasoning in general and we draw attention to differences between practical reasoning and reasoning about beliefs. We suggest that practical arguments should be treated as a species of presumptive reasoning, best...
متن کاملModelling the Level of Adoption of Analytical Tools; An Implementation of Multi-Criteria Evidential Reasoning
In the future, competitive advantages will be given to organisations that can extract valuable information from massive data and make better decisions. In most cases, this data comes from multiple sources. Therefore, the challenge is to aggregate them into a common framework in order to make them meaningful and useful.This paper will first review the most important multi-criteria decision analy...
متن کاملReasoning and intuiting the standards for judgments
What is the extension to which the act of reasoning and the standards of judgments are interrelated? The author, proposing Muslim scholars` views in the field and relying on traditions, ahadith, has concluded that firstly one has to answer the question: does the standard and expediency of Divine judgment lies in the judgment or in its object? The latter is signified, however, with view to so...
متن کاملPersuasive Political Argument
In this paper we discuss how a computational version of argumentation involving practical reasoning can be applied to the domain of e-democracy. We discuss our previous work which proposed an argument scheme and associated critical questions to make use of presumptive reasoning in order to justify a proposal for action. We explain how this proposal can be made computational for use by BDI agent...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2005